First part of the secure mail is available.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Bitdefender AntiVirus - www.bitdefender.com
Dangerous Attachment has been Removed. The file "message.zip" has been removed
because of a virus. It was infected with the "W32/Netsky.P-mm" virus. File
quarantined a
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1700
Logged by: Michael
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3
Operating system: Windows 2000 Pro
Description:Error on Subselect with date in where condition
Details:
Hello,
we're porting o
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1698
Logged by: Mauro Delfino
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4.6 and 8.0.3
Operating system: Debian and Windows 2003 Server
Description:Different behavior in UNIQUE and DISTINCT
Details:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1699
Logged by: Guillaume Beaudoin
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4.8
Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux
Description:Invalid timestamps with timezone and interger timestamps
Details:
SE
--- Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This does not belong on the pgsql-bugs list. The
> pgsql-novice or
> pgsql-performance lists seem more appropiate. I have
> set followups
> to the pgsql-novice list.
>
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:05:00 +0100,
> Bahadur Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 20:22:07 +0100,
Mauro Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have the these two tables:
> CREATE TABLE table_one
> ( field1 VARCHAR(255) );
>
> CREATE TABLE table_two
> ( field1 VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE );
>
> table_one has 500k records. I certify that all strings are dist
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:47:46PM +0100, Michael wrote:
>
> Description:Error on Subselect with date in where condition
Are you sure that "Subselect with date in where condition" accurately
describes the conditions that produce the error? Do you get the
error if you don't use a subselec
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruno Wolff III
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:58 PM
> To: Mauro Delfino
> Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1698: Different behavior in UNIQUE
> and DISTINCT
>
> On Thu, J
=?iso-8859-9?Q?Haluk_G=DCN=C7ER?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to get the patch list installed on the machine you compiled
> postgresQL FROM YOU , so that I can compare with ours. It takes about 12kB.
I used one of the PA-RISC servers provided by HP's testdrive program
http://www.t
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 00:09:00 -0700,
Bahadur Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Many thanks for this tip !
> But is this good idea to analyse/vacuuming the
> database tables while updates are taking place..
> Since, I update continuously say (100,000 ) times or
> more the same data set.
>
[Please copy the mailing list on replies. I'm sending this copy of
your message to the list so others can see what the problem was.]
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:48:19PM +0200, Michael Horsten wrote:
> I'm really sorry,
> it was my fault.
> I only executed the SQL Statement in "EMS SQL Query", not
Hello Tom,
You wrote that you ran postgresql on HPUX11.11.
Our Server type: V2500 12CPU 16GB RAM.
I would like to get the patch list installed on the machine you compiled
postgresQL FROM YOU , so that I can compare with ours. It takes about 12kB.
Command for patch list
# swlist
..
PHSS_3047
12 matches
Mail list logo
