[BUGS] BUG #1085: bug in the jdbc connector when doing intensive update/delete

The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1085 Logged by: Cedric Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 7.4 Operating system: Red Hat Linux release 8.0 Description:bug in the jdbc connector when doing intensive update/delete Details

Re: [BUGS] ecpg mapping struct members for indicators incorrectly?

--- Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:57:33AM -0800, Shelby > Cain wrote: > > I'm coming from a Pro*C background so I'm not > entirely > > certain whether what I am attempting is simply not > > allowed in ecpg or not. > > Well it should be. :-) > > Thanks for

Re: [BUGS] Known issue with Reindex-based corruption?

Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any known issues with index file corruption in the event of a > power-out during REINDEX with 7.2.4? There's been a lot of water over the dam since 7.2.4. I'd suggest offering more details if you want an informed comment. One question that

[BUGS] lock mode in DELETE

Hi all, I'm really bothered about the locking mode of the DELETE command on the Postgresql 7.3.4. It is blocking the table even from reading data. Is that a feature or a bug ? thanks, Merino __ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://a

Re: [BUGS] lock mode in DELETE

merino silva wrote: Hi all, I'm really bothered about the locking mode of the DELETE command on the Postgresql 7.3.4. It is blocking the table even from reading data. Is that a feature or a bug ? thanks, Merino __ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yah

Re: [BUGS] lock mode in DELETE

merino silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm really bothered about the locking mode of the > DELETE command on the Postgresql 7.3.4. It is blocking > the table even from reading data. Evidence? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)