Tom Lane wrote:
Richard Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This ordering is perverse!
No kidding.
No matter what the priority is of the
different characters, I cannot understand how the above can arise.
You are assuming that it's a byte-at-a-time process. It's not. I
believe the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> I verified this, and it's not GB specific as one might suggest... Same
> with en_US, de_DE, fr_FR, af_ZA. Does this behaviour really make sense
> to anybody?
Ummm, same with tr_TR (for a long time)
Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I verified this, and it's not GB specific as one might suggest... Same
> with en_US, de_DE, fr_FR, af_ZA.
Yeah, most of the locales use dictionary ordering rules.
> Does this behaviour really make sense to anybody?
You'd have to argue about it with th
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1084
Logged by: Reece Hart
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4
Operating system: linux 2.4.18 (smp)
Description:dropping in-use index causes "could not open relation
with OID..."
Deta
