On: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:19 AM "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the function is immutable but is executed 3 times
> > ( one for each row).
>
> So? Sounds to me like it's working as intended.
Well the documentation says:
IMMUTABLE [...
"Mendola Gaetano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:19 AM "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So? Sounds to me like it's working as intended.
> Well the documentation says:
> IMMUTABLE [...] If this option is given,
> any call of the function with all-constant
> a
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > #\d t_a
> > Table "public.t_a"
> > Column | Type | Modifiers
> > +-+---
> > a | integer |
> > b | integer | default 4
>
> This is a bug, or at least a bad idea
Apparently my mail hasn't made it to the list; here's a bounce.
fidx is always 1, set->freelist[] is full of NULLs except at index 1
where the value is either complete garbage or something that looks
like poisoned memory (0x7f7f7f7e).
The resolution of this bug is of critical importance to me, wi
