System Configuration
-
Architecture: Itanium2 64bits
Operating System: HP-UX 11i v. 1.6 (equivalent 11.22)
PostgreSQL version : 7.3.1
Compiler used : gcc 3.0
Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
I have made the attached change to look for pam/pam_appl.h as well as
security/pam_appl.h. Fix will appear in 7.4.
---
Aaron Hillegass wrote:
> I decided to build 7.3.1 on MacOS 10.2.3 with PAM support.
>
> % ./conf
unsubscribe
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Baffa Mario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -c tas.s
> tas.s: Assembler messages:
> tas.s:2: Error: Unsupported variable size or fill value
> tas.s:2: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored character is `='.
> tas.s:3: Error: Unknown pseud
System Configuration
-
Architecture: Itanium2 64bits
Operating System: HP-UX 11i v. 1.6 (equivalent 11.22)
PostgreSQL version : 7.3.1
Compiler used : gcc 3.0
Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
Hello,
I've noticed one problem by upgrading from postgresql-7.3.1 to 7.3.2.
The example of this problem looks like this:
create table test (a int, b text);
create view testview as select * from test;
create or replace rule testview_ins as
on insert to testview do instead
(
ins
Pavel Hanak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now calling "select testfun()" shows this fatal error:
>FATAL: SPI: improper call to spi_dest_setup
Hm, I'm glad I put in that test --- it exposed a problem. Here is
the patch for 7.3.
regards, tom lane
*** src/backend/exec
Affects: 7.1.3, 7.2.1 to 7.2.3, not tested on 7.3.x or 7.4dev
Frequency: 100% Reproducable
Effect When Occurring: Object Missing from Backup
Difficulty of Fix: Unknown
For some time, I've been noticing that one of my database projects fails to
back up a few functions every time I run pg_dump
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For some time, I've been noticing that one of my database projects fails to
> back up a few functions every time I run pg_dump.I've seen this since
> 7.1.3. Finally, I have a sample of the database that invariably refuses to
> back up one function
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, seems we need Itanium2-specific test-and-set functions for HPUX, or
> perhaps our problem is that HPUX is assumed to be PA-RISC.
Both. But until someone contributes some Itanium assembly code, there's
little point in generalizing the HPUX config set
Ah, seems we need Itanium2-specific test-and-set functions for HPUX, or
perhaps our problem is that HPUX is assumed to be PA-RISC.
The problem appears to be coming from
/pg/backend/port/hpux/tas.s.template. However, I have to say I don't
see any fancy assembly in there. I am confused.
Could we use DOMAIN to make MONEY an alias for NUMERIC, perhaps using
locale to make it customized, somehow?
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > we need someone to get MONEY working as an extented NUME
Tom,
> > For some time, I've been noticing that one of my database projects fails
to
> > back up a few functions every time I run pg_dump.I've seen this since
> > 7.1.3. Finally, I have a sample of the database that invariably refuses
to
> > back up one function.
>
> What do you m
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What do you mean by "refuses"?
> The function is silently dropped from the pg_dump file.
Is it possible that the function's owner has been dropped from pg_shadow?
How about dropped return type, etc? pg_dump used to use inner joins to
collect info about
Tom,
> Is it possible that the function's owner has been dropped from pg_shadow?
No, the function owner is the database owner ... and also the same user
calling pg_dump.
> How about dropped return type, etc? pg_dump used to use inner joins to
> collect info about database objects, meaning it
15 matches
Mail list logo
