[BUGS] configure

2002-11-19 Thread Matt Mackenzie
Hi, Thank You for such a great product. I had some problems with the build, the configue script wasn't picking up the GNU readline library(I compiled from source). I went online and saw many people were having the same issue as I did. I looked @ the configure script and realised my problem

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL No Longer Handles Mixed Case Sequences

2002-11-19 Thread Brian Harris
Tom, Thanks for the response. The tables were created from the output from the previous release pg_dump program, which omitted the double quotes in the DEFAULT nextval() clause.  I have tested the new version of pg_dump which includes them if the sequence name contain mixed case characters. Reg

Re: [BUGS] Bug #820: RULE on INSERT unable to access NEW

2002-11-19 Thread Kristofer Munn
Both Tom Lane & Stephan Szabo have pointed out that I should use a trigger for my needs (and I will). Hopefully that will work for me in my case. Good to know the NULL bug will be fixed in the next version, even if I won't be needing it. Thanks, as always, for the quick turnaround. - Kristof

[BUGS] Bug #821: bug when using between or <= on varchar fields

2002-11-19 Thread pgsql-bugs
Thomas Piszczek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description bug when using between or <= on varchar fields Long Description I just recognized that when using between or <= and >= on varchar fields postgresql behaves quite s

Re: [BUGS] Bug #821: bug when using between or <= on varchar fields

2002-11-19 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thomas Piszczek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > bug when using between or <= on varchar fields > > Long Description > I just recognized that when using betwee