Hello!
I've encountered certain--opposite to documentation--DBMS behavoiur. Let's
narrow down my DB schema to few tables, which can reproduce this problem.
I have these schemas:
CREATE TABLE "users"
(
"id_user" SERIAL NOT NULL,
"first" VARCHAR(24) NOT NULL DEFAULT '(imi\352)',
"last"VAR
Hi,
While using Postgres, I encountered some unexpected behaviour.
In short:
-
Upon doing a faulty INSERT which left a column with default value
nextval('sequence') unspecified, the INSERT aborted due to an error.
However, a call had been placed to nextval('sequence'), thus
increasing th
hello,
this segfault is all about PQclear();
according to the docs libpq-exec.html
#
PQclear Frees the storage associated with the PGresult. Every query
result should be freed via PQclear when it is no longer needed.
void PQclear(PQresult *res);
You can keep a PGresult object around for as
Hugo Jonker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Upon doing a faulty INSERT which left a column with default value
> nextval('sequence') unspecified, the INSERT aborted due to an error.
> However, a call had been placed to nextval('sequence'), thus
> increasing the sequence, while this value never got us
eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this segfault is all about PQclear();
If you pass an uninitialized pointer to a library routine, it's likely
to segfault. This is *your* bug, not the library's, because the library
routine has no way to know that you gave it a random pointer value
instead of so
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Hugo Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While using Postgres, I encountered some unexpected behaviour.
>
> In short:
> -
> Upon doing a faulty INSERT which left a column with default value
> nextval('sequence') unspecified, the INSERT aborted due to an error.
> However, a call ha
"Tomis³aw Kityñski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it seems, like action in the
> rule does not see "id_user" value set to default value in NEW
> tuple.
Yeah, this is a known bug in 7.2 and 7.2.1 --- ON INSERT rules fail to
see values inserted by DEFAULTs. It's fixed in current development
sou
Well, nextval() doesn't hold a lock for the duration of the transaction,
so it still increments. It is a performance optimization.
---
Hugo Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While using Postgres, I encountered some unexpected behav
We are running pg 7.1.3. x86 Redhat 6.1 with 2.4.17 and glibc 2.2.2.
We have several s/w subsystems which keep some pg backends open for a VERY
period of time. (Well the whole time the machine is powered up.), and others
which have a short lifetime when connected to pg backends.
The total amount
dear postgres developers,
i have just noticed a big problem with dump/restore from version 6.5.3 to 7.2.
but i think it is not version related.
if i dump a db with default date format european '-e' and restore that dump into
a db without '-e' all dates are wrong. i think the dump/restore should
Peter Czulak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 1
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
Invalid UNICODE character sequence found (0xc236)
Long Description
PostgreSQL version 7.2.1
OS: RedHat Linux 7.2
Platform: IBM 220 server
Some insert statements are f
Richard Cook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
Wrong shlib flag for GCC compilation on Solaris
Long Description
In the file .../src/Makefile.shlib, line 178, the "-G" flag is set for compilation of
shared librari
> Short Description
> Invalid UNICODE character sequence found (0xc236)
Are you sure that above error message is for the below example?
I got: Invalid UNICODE character sequence found (0xc033)
> INSERT INTO ftp_log_t (ftp_log_source, ftp_from_site_id, ftp_file_status, ftp_file,
>ftp_log_date, f
In current CVS I see this, which looks fine. Does yours look the same?
---
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), solaris)
shlib :=
lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_
VERSION)
ifndef cplusplus
ifeq
I suspect that data stored in your database was not EUC_CN. GB2312(or
GBK) is different from EUC_CN. Can you show me the INSERT statement
text in gzipped form to prevent accidental changes while relaying the
mail chanin?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
> Hello,
>
> I am using Postgresql 7.1 on Linux pl
15 matches
Mail list logo