Re: [BUGS] Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL

2002-05-28 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 04:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Reading between a few lines I got the impression that the manual > > suggested something like: > > CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename%ROWTYPE ) RETURNS ... > > When I finally got my function working, I

Re: [BUGS] Bug #680: NOCREATETABLE

2002-05-28 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:57:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I saw a artiche what say that in 7.2 PostgreSQL version, the resource of create a >user with NOCREATETABLE was ready to use. > > I don't know where you saw that, but it has nothing to do with reality. I t

Re: [BUGS] Documentation regarding %ROWTYPE in PL/PgSQL

2002-05-28 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... I can't supply either %ROWTYPE or %TYPE within the parameter > definition without an error either. Looks like I was mistaken: table.field%type works, but table%type does not: test72=# create table foo (f1 int, f2 text); CREATE test72=# create fun

[BUGS] plpgsql function behaves strange

2002-05-28 Thread Christian Zagrodnick
see attachment -- Christian Zagrodnick gocept gmbh & co. kg - schalaunische strasse 6 - 06366 koethen/anhalt fon. +49 3496 3099114 fax. +49 3496 3099118 mob. +49 173 9078826 mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] If PostgreSQL failed to compile on your computer or you found a bug that is likely to be speci

Re: [BUGS] Bug #679: Time input format is no longer ISO 8601 compliant

2002-05-28 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> ... it should be possible to enter 'time' fields as "10" for 10:00:00. Try prepending a "T" to the front of the string (also allowed per ISO-8601). Will be fixed in the next release to allow the number-only form. - Thomas ---(end of broadcast)--