Re: [BUGS] Bug #657: VB DAO MoveFirst/MoveLast become invalid

2002-05-07 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > VB DAO MoveFirst/MoveLast become invalid operation > > Long Description > The VB program gets DAO RecordSet from a query to Postgresql

Re: [BUGS] Bug #651: Time difference of 30 in while reading in timestamp

2002-05-07 Thread R Ravishankar
Is it safe to assume that this difference of 30 mins would be consistent even if our implementation in used across different timezones ? Moreover it was found that if we retrieve the resultset as a getString instead of a getTimestamp, it returns correctly. But the valueOf operator to convert

[BUGS] problem with the sum function

2002-05-07 Thread Marco Kienzle
The following problem occur using the sum() function (see the attached file for all the details and an example): - if you use it on a portion of a table (example: table age) you get a result that differ from the one you can get by hand (see the whole table temp1 and do the sum by hand)

Re: [BUGS] Bug #651: Time difference of 30 in while reading in timestamp

2002-05-07 Thread Tom Lane
R Ravishankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Moreover it was found that if we retrieve the resultset as a getString instead of a >getTimestamp, it returns correctly. Oh? That suggests that the problem is in JDBC or the underlying JVM. I'd suggest asking the pgsql-jdbc list about it.

Re: [BUGS] problem with the sum function

2002-05-07 Thread Dmitry Tkach
'group by' must be your problem. If you remove that clause from your second query, you should then get the same result (77) sum'ing the temp table... I hope, it helps... Dima Marco Kienzle wrote: >The following problem occur using the sum() function (see the attached >file for all the details

[BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB

2002-05-07 Thread pgsql-bugs
Michael Enke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB Long Description OS: Linux Kernel 2.4.4, PostgreSQL version 7.2.1 lower() and upper() doesn't work like expected for multibyte

Re: [BUGS] problem with the sum function

2002-05-07 Thread Tom Lane
Marco Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > herring=3D# select sum(agenum) from age where weightmeanage>0 and lengthcel= > l=3D160; > sum=20 > - > 77 > (1 row) > select INTO TABLE temp1 inst, year, month, lengthcell, sex, age, agenum, w= > eightmeanage from age where weightmeanage>0 and l