Re: [BUGS] Bug #576: Can not compile IRIX + GCC

2002-02-08 Thread Luis Amigo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > oota toshiya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > Can not compile IRIX + GCC > > Long Description > /src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c line 173 > > .global tas

Re: [BUGS] Bug #577: incorect sort using order by

2002-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > my question : why 'ACTIGINT' is after 'ACTI-CRE'. Under Oracle > 'ACTIGINT' is after 'ACTI-SUP' that's better. If you think that, you should be using C locale not whatever you are using (perhaps en-US locale). Postgres sorts according to the rules of the locale that t

Re: [CYGWIN] [BUGS] resource leak in 7.2

2002-02-08 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Pfau > > I'm attaching two sql scripts in a zip file. Run script1.sql from one > session. After it's done with the inserts, start script2.sql in another > session. Have task manager running in the background and watch the > backends eat handles. I test

[BUGS] Bug #578: pg_dumpall from 7.1.3 can not be imported in 7.2.0

2002-02-08 Thread pgsql-bugs
Rainer Tammer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 1 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description pg_dumpall from 7.1.3 can not be imported in 7.2.0 Long Description The DB dump from 7.1.3 can not be imported in 7.2.0. 1. error the user root has id 0 and the imp

Re: [BUGS] Bug #578: pg_dumpall from 7.1.3 can not be imported in

2002-02-08 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 2. tables with complex foreign key constrains will not be imported I probably couldn't help with the other question, but... What do you mean by this? Does it error on the creation, does it make the tables but not the constraints? ---

Re: [BUGS] Bug #578: pg_dumpall from 7.1.3 can not be imported in

2002-02-08 Thread Rainer Tammer
Hello, On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:32:50 -0800 (PST), Stephan Szabo wrote: > >On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> 2. tables with complex foreign key constrains will not be imported > >I probably couldn't help with the other question, but... > >What do you mean by this? Does it error on t