Re: [BUGS] WAL Log numbering

2001-09-18 Thread Tom Lane
Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would have though that after 00FE would be > 0100, not 0001. This is the intended behavior, I believe. The low-order half is a 32-bit byte offset DIV XLogSegSize --- we could compress out the zero bits, but only at

[BUGS] Website, mailing list

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
I've tried unsuccessfully to subscribe to some list. Majordom doesn't understand me. I asked for help. Majordomo doesn't understand that either. Thought I'd recheck the website to see what I really ought to do. I get this: While trying to retrieve the URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/index.

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
Sorry all. There was a certain amount of nonsence in my previous posting on this topic. The failing sql command is an fact a select into. It fails when trying to retrieve a null value. The insert worked (I can retrieve the record if I don't ask for the null field, so evidently the insert code i

Re: [BUGS] WAL Log numbering

2001-09-18 Thread Justin Clift
Tom Lane wrote: > > Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would have though that after 00FE would be > > 0100, not 0001. > > > Just checked through the Interactive docs (not sure which version of 7.1 > > they are) and says the numbers should be seque

[BUGS] CVS rejected me

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
This worked 2-3 days ago: what's changed? vs -z9 -q update cvs update: authorization failed: server postgresql.org rejected access to /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot for user anoncvs summer@dugite pgsql$ The entry's still in ~/.cvspass ---(end of broadcast)--

[BUGS] a small doubt

2001-09-18 Thread srinivas
sir, can iknow how many maximum number of connections can be made in postgresql.if i can get the answer soon ,iwould be very thankfull to you sir. cheers chowdary. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [BUGS] Website, mailing list

2001-09-18 Thread Tom Lane
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I asked for help. Majordomo doesn't understand that either. What did you do exactly? The following message brought back a help response for me: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:48:50 -0400 From: Tom Lane <[

Re: [BUGS] CVS rejected me

2001-09-18 Thread Marc G. Fournier
go to anoncvs.postgresql.org, not postgresql.org .. On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, John Summerfield wrote: > This worked 2-3 days ago: what's changed? > > vs -z9 -q update > cvs update: authorization failed: server postgresql.org rejected access to >/home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot for user anoncvs > summe

Re: [BUGS] SQLCODE==-209

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > John Summerfield writes: > > > I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation >doesn't build. > > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/index.html I don't normally have web access. I'd much prefer th

Re: [BUGS] Performance and 72.devel

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > ... > > I think that if it actually reused them instead of deleting old files... > > That is in fact what it does for at least the upcoming 7.2 release. > > It's not what I see now in 7.2devel. Unless the changes are uncommitted (or commited in the