Sebastien Bechet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
triggered data change violation on relation
Long Description
We have exactly the same problem :
http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1032531
Stephan Szab
Hi,
I shall try to write english well enough :)
I'm writing a GUI client to access my PostrgeSQL DB, with FLTK libraries.
Sometimes, the client crashes.
I have written un source code, as little as possible, without FLTK libraries,
to test the behavior of PQfinish(), and I noticed :
If no connexio
Hello!
-
> createdb test
CREATE DATABASE
> createlang plpgsql test
> psql test
Welcome to psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
create function testcnt () returns int4 as '
declare
rp int4;
begin
select count(*) into rp from test
I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation doesn't
build.
Consequently I'm forced to rely on documentation for 7.1.2/3 which does not mention
-209, at least in the ecpg documentation I'm looking at,
Nore does it appear in the DB2 documentation I'm using as sec
I have something like this:
billy=# EXPLAIN SELECT * from kursy where id_trasy=1 and
data_kursu=date('2001-12-12');
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using pp on kursy (cost=0.00..51.55 rows=1 width=18)
billy=# EXPLAIN SELECT * from kursy where id_trasy=1
and data_kursu='2001-12-12';
NOTICE:
hello,
I have a problem with a foreign key.
I have got a 7.1 PGSQL and pg_dump version
I've got a foreign key error whereas i'm sure that the value exists since i
make a SELECT before.
It's a PHP/PGSQL application. There is what it returns :
(it's what i have into my HTML page)
---
we have some perl code that used a DBD::Pg statement handle after
the parent database handle had been disconnected.
by doing this we could consistently put libpq into a spin:
PQexec (conn=0x829e120,
query=0x82a2b80 "SELECT \"login\"\n\t FROM \"account\"\n", ' ' , "WHERE \"id\" = '1'\n"
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Tomasz Myrta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why the first expression is 25 times slower?
>
> Hard to say, when you haven't shown us the schema. (Column datatypes,
> definitions of available indexes, etc are all critical information for
> this sort of question.)
OK
Don't pa
Angus Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> by doing this we could consistently put libpq into a spin:
Hmmm ... the patch you give is no good as-is, since it will break the
behavior for "normal" errors. If we want to work around this, we'll
need some way to distinguish persistent inside-libpq failu
I posted this about 2 weeks ago and saw no further follow ups. Is this
timestamp thing not considered a bug? Or am I just doing something wrong?
Thanks,
--Rainer
> -Original Message-
> Sorry to reopen this issue but I still think there is a bug
> somewhere,
> perhaps in the JDBC dr
John Summerfield writes:
> I'm using 7.2devel from CVS, and as I've already reported, the documentation doesn't
>build.
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/index.html
> Consequently I'm forced to rely on documentation for 7.1.2/3 which
> does not mention -209, at least in t
Szima Gabor writes:
> Table-OID are cached and not flushed after DROP TABLE?
Something like that, but what are you expecting?
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can ge
12 matches
Mail list logo
