Re: [BUGS] Bug #435: Cannot connect to databases if using Capital

2001-09-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Peter Eisentraut writes: > > James Pattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > > > If I create a database Ex. BUGS it shows up as bugs instead of BUGS. > > I can drop the database by saying "drop database BUGS;" and it works > > but I can not do a \c BUGS or psql BUGS. I get

[BUGS] Error in backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c: ProcSleep()

2001-09-03 Thread Tomasz Zielonka
Hi! Platform: PostgreSQL 7.1.3, Linux 2.4.8, egcs 2.91.66 PostgreSQL forgets to release lock until shutdown in this scenario: CREATE TABLE dummy (X integer); session1 session2 BEGIN; |

Re: [BUGS] RE: Error on postgresql driver (or pg_hba)

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
"Ron Looi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > find_hba_entry: Unable to open authentication config file > "/opt/postgresql-7.1.2/data/pg_hba.conf": File table overflow Looks like you'd better increase your kernel configuration setting for NFILE (max number of open files the kernel can deal with at onc

Re: [BUGS] Bug #432: Macaddr accepts empty string

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The datatype macaddr accepts empty strings as data. I think this is > not correct; an empty string is no valid mac address. This is already changed for 7.2. regression=# select ''::macaddr; ERROR: macaddr_in: error in parsing "" regression=#

Re: [BUGS] postmaster quits

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Marc Prewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.1): PostgreSQL-7.1beta4 Why are you still running a beta release? > Our development server, on occaision, runs out of swap space and > inevitably when it does, the postmaster process stops. I think you are

Re: [BUGS] Re: low performance

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Andreas Wernitznig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To make it more comparable I have made two additional runs, a slow and > a fast one with exactly the same number of inserts (about 20500) and > put it on our ftp server: >> However, I think what is happening is that some queries are being done >> a

Re: [BUGS] Re: low performance

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Andreas Wernitznig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only way to make it faster after step 3 is to close that connection (and stop >that postmaster thread with it) and establish a new one. > It seems like the planner (at least for pk checking) of an *established* connection >to a database doesn'

Re: [BUGS] Re: low performance

2001-09-03 Thread Andreas Wernitznig
Yes, I understand very clearly what you mean. Maybe my mails were to confused, that's why I try to explain my problem once more: step 1. An empty table with a primary key (=index key) where an "explain" tells me, that a Seq Scan is used to SELECT a special row. step 2. Then I start to fill dat

Re: [BUGS] Excess disk usage

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I attempted to load data amounting to 21 mbytes into a table which has > a unique key both otherwise doesn't have indexes. > The WALs consumed 2.9 Gigabytes of disk (and doubtless would have taken > more if there was more to be had). That seems li

Re: Odp: [BUGS] PD: triggered data change violation on relation "tbl_b"

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This was a mistake in the interpretation of the spec (modification of > the same key row referenced by a foreign key constraint in the same > statement more than once is an error is how we believe the spec meant > it, but there's a case where they mentio

Re: [BUGS] Error in backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c: ProcSleep()

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Tomasz Zielonka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Platform: PostgreSQL 7.1.3, Linux 2.4.8, egcs 2.91.66 > PostgreSQL forgets to release lock until shutdown in this scenario: This seems to be a real bug, but I don't like your proposed fix... the problem evidently is that some lock structure is not bei

Re: Odp: [BUGS] PD: triggered data change violation on relation

2001-09-03 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This was a mistake in the interpretation of the spec (modification of > > the same key row referenced by a foreign key constraint in the same > > statement more than once is an error is how we believe the spec me

Re: [BUGS] Error in backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c: ProcSleep()

2001-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Tomasz Zielonka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Platform: PostgreSQL 7.1.3, Linux 2.4.8, egcs 2.91.66 > PostgreSQL forgets to release lock until shutdown in this scenario: Good catch! This has been broken since 7.1 ... surprising that no one discovered the problem sooner. I think that rather than

[BUGS] Bug #437: postgresql-python rpm fails on mx dependency

2001-09-03 Thread pgsql-bugs
Robert Blyler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 1 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description postgresql-python rpm fails on mx dependency Long Description Tried to install the postgresql-7.1.3 rpm's. posgtgresql-python fails on a dependency on mx. I've trie

Re: [BUGS] Bug #432: Macaddr accepts empty string

2001-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Not any more: test=> create table pp (x macaddr); CREATE test=> insert into pp values (''); ERROR: macaddr_in: error in parsing "" > Daniel Mantione ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > The lower the number the more severe it is. >