Thanks for the reply Tom Lane, and Tom Lockhart. On my 7.0.3:
phil=# select '4/1/2001'::date::timestamp;
?column?
2001-03-31 23:00:00-08
(1 row)
This was built from source downloaded from the primary FTP site link
on www.postgresql.org.
[cartret@Sti
Downloaded V7.0.3 from latest area.
Followed build instructions on my Alpha Linux box.
Regression test instructions do not work as postmaster (or something
similarly named) isn't running.
If this is part of Postgresql, you need to say how to start it.
If its not part of postgresql, you need to
long ago gone ... if you want to get on a list to post to, without being
swamped with email, send a 'subscribe-nomail' to the -request address for
the list ... especially great for those using news to post to the lists :)
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Jason Schroeder wrote:
> http://www.postgresql.org/
Hi,
when I ./pg_dump -?, the text that's shown ends:
"...if no database name is not supplied..."
bye,
Bert
Ah, I think I understand the trouble now. It's good it's fixed for
the next release. And, as predicted, I'm running in a DST zone
(/etc/localtime -> ../usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Pacific)
Thanks for the quick diagnosis!
Phil
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lock
ascii() returns negative ASCII values? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity
of 4
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
ascii() picks up sign bit past CHAR value 127
Long Description
The lack of an UNISIGNED INT1 attribute type forces those of us
who need a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The lack of an UNISIGNED INT1 attribute type forces those of us who
> need a positive numeric byte type to use CHAR. The ascii() function
> ostensibly returns the numeric ASCII value of the corresponding CHAR
> attribute value - but once you get beyond the 0-127 ACCII
