Rani Pinchuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 1
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
Bug in select with 'like' and index of two columns
Long Description
As you will see below - when I use index on two columns in the case below, a select
with "like" d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As you will see below - when I use index on two columns in the case
> below, a select with "like" doesn't work correctly.
This looks like a variant of the known problems with LIKE index
optimization in non-ASCII locales. What locale settings (environment
variables) ar
Hi,
I've tried to install your database and I can't run the initdb (see logfile
below)> I've installed it on a compact deskpro (DPENS P5000/10.0/N4 EUROA4)
platform with Red Hat Linux 6.2.
Could you please help me.
Best regards
> Rami Zalloum
><>
errorlog
Dear Postgres,
I think it's a bug!
The command 'make bigcheck' runs perfectly in all
respects. However, the 'sequential test geometry' test reports
FAILED.
Bug?
Lou Picciano
RAMI ZALLOUM writes:
> I've tried to install your database and I can't run the initdb (see logfile
> below)> I've installed it on a compact deskpro (DPENS P5000/10.0/N4 EUROA4)
> platform with Red Hat Linux 6.2.
> Could you please help me.
Read the FAQ.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTE
"Lou Picciano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The command 'make bigcheck' runs perfectly in all respects. However, the '=
> sequential test geometry' test reports FAILED.
What Postgres version? On what platform? What exactly are the
differences in the geometry output (are they just low-order-di
OK, I think I understand this now.
getDatabaseProductVersion() calls getVersion, which is defined in
Driver.java.in as the version string from configure. It returns the
version of the client jdbc code. To get the server version, you need
that SELECT you suggested.
Is that OK?
> I think Peter
Sorry, I am just now catching up to the fact that this problem was
already discussed. I have gotten the patch from the URL supplied by the
author, and have applied it to the CVS tree. It will appear in
tomorrow's snapshot, and in 7.1.
Thanks for the patch. Someone else we complaining about th
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, should we return the client or server version from the interface?
> > If we return the server version, how does someone query the client version?
>
> sorry, yes. the client-side interfaces (DatabaseMetaData.getDriver*)
> are actually fine -
Thanks. This URL was a huge help. I applied the change to the proper
function.
> I think Peter Mount looked at it, but there where some big changes to
> the JDBC driver going on at that time. When I look at the code in CVS
> now it looks nothing like what it did when I did the patch against it
10 matches
Mail list logo
