Hi!
Here's a traceback from the time it failed, unfortunately without
debugging symbols. I cannot reproduce this error on a fresh
installation on another machine, which puzzles me. I though it might
have to do with the the database beeing dumped/restored to this new
installation, but I found no w
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cannot reproduce this error on a fresh
> installation on another machine, which puzzles me. I though it might
> have to do with the the database beeing dumped/restored to this new
> installation, but I found no way to get the data there without
> du
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GNU gdb 4.18
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x8136eb2 in GetTemplateEncoding ()
> #1 0x8136d66 in pg_mb2wchar_with_len ()
> #2 0x810adab in int8_text ()
> #3 0x810ae82 in textlike ()
> #4 0x812ef14
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and GetTemplateEncoding is just about as SEGV-proof as any routine
> I've ever seen:
>
> static inttemplateEncoding;
> ...
> int
> GetTemplateEncoding()
> {
> return (templateEncoding);
> }
Heh
> I speculate that you gave gdb the wrong executabl
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was surprised that there was funcion names, since there shouldn't be
> any (no debugging symbols).
Not necessarily. If you haven't applied strip(1) to the executable,
there will be function names in the backtrace on most platforms, even
without -g
> Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNU gdb 4.18
> > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x8136eb2 in GetTemplateEncoding ()
> > #1 0x8136d66 in pg_mb2wchar_with_len ()
> > #2 0x810adab in int8_text ()
> > #3 0x810ae82 in textlike ()
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I do not believe this backtrace. textlike does not call int8_text;
> Only Tom Lane could question a backtrace and get away with it. :-)
If you haven't ever seen a bogus backtrace, you've not been using
debuggers long enough ;-). gdb has no good way
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I do not believe this backtrace. textlike does not call int8_text;
>
> > Only Tom Lane could question a backtrace and get away with it. :-)
>
> If you haven't ever seen a bogus backtrace, you've not been using
> debuggers long enough ;-). gdb h
