[BUGS] JDBC & XML-DBMS

1. JDBC Driver returns empty separator in the database catalog. 2. Why JDBC Driver returns column (procedures etc.) name pattern in lower case? Al

[BUGS] Ответ: [BUGS] reproducable command sequence to get "mdopen: Couldn't open..."

>>Making ALTER TABLE RENAME abort-safe requires changing the conventions >>for naming physical table files, and the details have been sufficiently >>controversial that it's not been done yet. In the meantime our only >>choices are to forbid ALTER TABLE RENAME withi

Re: [BUGS] psql: ERROR: MultiByte strings (MB) must be enabled to use this function

> When I am trying to connect to my remote database kenyellow pages i.e. > psql -h colo.kenyaweb.com -p 5432 kenyellowpages, am getting this error > psql: ERROR: MultiByte strings (MB) must be enabled to use this function I get this symptom when mixing a 7.0.x client with a 6.5.x server.

Re: [BUGS] Page 13 of tutorial has a typo I believe

Thanks. This has been fixed. > Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 4 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > Page 13 of tutorial has a typo I believe > > Long Description > the Cartesian product of domains. > > such that V1 (is a

[BUGS] constraints evaluate 'now' immediately

Roger Wernersson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description constraints evaluate 'now' immediately Long Description I run Postgres 6.5.3 on Alpha/Linux. I would like a constraint stating that a column may not have a date

Re: [BUGS] constraints evaluate 'now' immediately

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I would like a constraint stating that a column may not have a date in the future: > CHECK(my_date <= 'now') > but I think it stores the time of constraint creation. Yes, because 'now' is evaluated when the constant is parsed. Try CHECK(my_date <= now()) inste

[BUGS] bug-report

POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT Your name : Eivind Kvedalen Your email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED] System C

Re: [BUGS] eeeh... buffer leak?

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > ulsec=# truncate job; > > NOTICE: Buffer Leak: [002] (freeNext=-3, freePrev=-3, relname=job, blockNum=0, > > flags=0xc, refcount=1 -1) > > TRUNCATE > > Hmm, that's interesting. It shouldn't be possible for PrivateRefCount > (the last value printed) to

[BUGS] Bug!!

Applet: Something unusual has occured to cause the driver to fail. Please report this exception: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.net.SocketPermission 127.0.0.1:5432 connect,resolve) java.lang.Throwable() java.lang.Exception() java.sql.SQLException() o

Re: [BUGS] eeeh... buffer leak?

Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hmm, that's interesting. It shouldn't be possible for PrivateRefCount >> (the last value printed) to become negative. Can you give a sequence >> for reproducing this notice from a standing start? > Unfortunately not. I was very very surprised whe

Re: [BUGS] bug-report

> to_char gives incorrect day conversion of the date 2000/03/26. This is fixed in the current (development) sources. - Thomas

[BUGS]