2013/04/10 23:44、Andres Freund のメッセージ:
> On 2013-04-10 23:37:44 +0900, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
>> Thanks all,
>>
>> (2013/04/10 22:55), Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong
wr
On 2013-04-10 23:37:44 +0900, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> (2013/04/10 22:55), Andres Freund wrote:
> >On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong
> >>wrote:
> >>>In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is
Thanks all,
(2013/04/10 22:55), Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
So if it is solved in 9.3 i think there is a way
On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
> > In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
> > So if it is solved in 9.3 i think there is a way to terminate it.
> > I hope it is fixed in
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
> In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
> So if it is solved in 9.3 i think there is a way to terminate it.
> I hope it is fixed in 9.1 soon
Hmm. He said that,
> But in my environment the sender pr
のメッセージ:
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:49 PM Dang Minh Huong wrote:
>> To: Amit Kapila
>> Subject: Re: [BUGS] replication_timeout not effective
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:49 PM
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your soon reply.
>>
>> I
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:49 PM Dang Minh Huong wrote:
> To: Amit Kapila
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] replication_timeout not effective
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:49 PM
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your soon reply.
>
> I'm trying to set the network timeout related
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:35 AM Dang Minh Huong wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering if this is a bug of PostgreSQL.
> PostgreSQL's show that replication_timeout parameter can "Terminate
> replication connections that are inactive longer than the specified number of
> milliseconds". But in my env
