Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. When we implemented the current
> > elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so th
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Eu
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. When we implemented the current
> elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
>
Agreed.
> If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I thought it needed changing for consistency. Shouldn't status messages
> > like this be INFO:
> > test=> REINDEX DATABASE test;
> > NOTICE: table "pg_class" was reindexed
>
> > If I do VACUUM VERBOSE, those messages are INFO.
>
> Yeah, *only
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I thought it needed changing for consistency. Shouldn't status messages
> like this be INFO:
> test=> REINDEX DATABASE test;
> NOTICE: table "pg_class" was reindexed
> If I do VACUUM VERBOSE, those messages are INFO.
Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. W
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> Why is this an improvement? AFAIR an INFO message is *not suppressible*
> by adjusting client_min_messages, therefore this makes the system more
> chatty not less so. It certainly doesn't do anything to address the
> origin
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Patch applied. Thanks.
Why is this an improvement? AFAIR an INFO message is *not suppressible*
by adjusting client_min_messages, therefore this makes the system more
chatty not less so. It certainly doesn't do anything to address the
original complaint.
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> > I used wanted to point out the the ( -q, --quiet ) parameter for
> > reindexdb command utility does not work.
> Actually it is *not* a bug. The NOTICE is pr
Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
> >You can always ignore NOTICE. grep is your friend. :-)
> True, but usually I like to have my ERROR messages to stderr and INFO
> to stdout.
>
But it's not true in PostgreSQL. All ereport() messages are sent to
stderr. In some scripts, the -e (echo) is used to print co
31 maj 2006 kl. 03:47 skrev Euler Taveira de Oliveira:
I used wanted to point out the the ( -q, --quiet ) parameter for
reindexdb command utility does not work.
Actually it is *not* a bug. The NOTICE is printed by the REINDEX
command; reindexdb is just a wrapper around REINDEX command. If you
> I used wanted to point out the the ( -q, --quiet ) parameter for
> reindexdb command utility does not work.
Actually it is *not* a bug. The NOTICE is printed by the REINDEX
command; reindexdb is just a wrapper around REINDEX command. If you
set up 'client_min_messages' in postgresql.conf, you d
11 matches
Mail list logo
