Re: [BUGS] pg_dump -t option doesn't take schema-qualified table names

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: >> IMO that's not a bug; you should spell it pg_dump -n foo -t bar. >> The other way is ambiguous with a table named "foo.bar". > Oh, I didn't realize that dots are allowed in table names. But is there > an unambiguous

Re: [BUGS] pg_dump -t option doesn't take schema-qualified table names

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It appears that the command "pgsql -t foo.bar" will not dump the table > bar in the schema foo. I saw a patch a while back to add schema support > to pg_dump (with the --namespace option), but I did not see a fix for > this. IMO that's not a bug; you shou