Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> When overwriting an lo with a larger lo, the old data is not overwritten. This was
>supposed to be fixed in 6.5, but it happens in 7.0.3
>
> Please try your test case in 7.1beta3 or later. The large-object
> support has been rather completely r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> When overwriting an lo with a larger lo, the old data is not overwritten. This was
>supposed to be fixed in 6.5, but it happens in 7.0.3.
Please try your test case in 7.1beta3 or later. The large-object
support has been rather completely rewritten ... if this bug is
