Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-16 Thread Kris Jurka
On 16 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream() > > > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that > > > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-16 Thread Martin Holz
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream() > > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that > > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[] b,int offset,int len ) > > will always read len byte

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-15 Thread Kris Jurka
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > Hello, > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream() > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[] b,int offset,int len ) > will always read len bytes. InputStream only guarantees to > return at least 1

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-09 Thread Martin Holz
On Friday 09 January 2004 17:18, Kris Jurka wrote: > I was referring to the documentation for setBinaryStream. You > mentioned that it should throw an Exception if it couldn't read > "length" bytes from the stream. I was commenting that our > implementation might be wrong by checking the length

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-09 Thread Kris Jurka
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > On Friday 09 January 2004 09:46, Kris Jurka wrote: > > > The odd thing about the javadocs is that they say "The data will be > > read from the stream as needed until end-of-file is reached." The > > length parameter's comment is "the number of bytes in t

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-09 Thread Martin Holz
On Friday 09 January 2004 09:46, Kris Jurka wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream() > > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that > > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[] b,int offset,int len ) > > will always read

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-09 Thread Martin Holz
On Friday 09 January 2004 09:46, Kris Jurka wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream() > > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that > > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[] b,int offset,int len ) > > will always read

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream bug and

2004-01-09 Thread Kris Jurka
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martin Holz wrote: > Hello, > > org.postgresql.jdbc1.AbstractJdbc1Statement.setBinaryStream() > in postgresql 7.4.1 wrongly assumes, that > java.io.InputStream.read(byte[] b,int offset,int len ) > will always read len bytes. InputStream only guarantees to > return at least 1