Re: [BUGS] inpricise checkpoint stats

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I raise this problem because (1) I want to add a stat number for xlog > write/sync; (2) Considering we may have a background xlog writer (discussed > long time before), the stats may become pointless for local process. The bgwriter is already capable o

Re: [BUGS] inpricise checkpoint stats

2006-03-22 Thread Qingqing Zhou
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problematic line is "0 written" -- > > What's your point? Those stats are correct for the current process (or > if not, better take it up with your kernel vendor) and we've never > stated that they are anyt

Re: [BUGS] inpricise checkpoint stats

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problematic line is "0 written" -- What's your point? Those stats are correct for the current process (or if not, better take it up with your kernel vendor) and we've never stated that they are anything else than process-local stats. In every ver