Thomas Kellerer writes:
> in the description of the ORDER BY clause
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-select.html#SQL-ORDERBY)
> it says:
> "Character-string data is sorted according to the locale-specific collation
> order that was established when the database was created."
On 20 January 2012 02:53, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, done.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.po
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 18:47, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan
>> wrote:
>>> ISTM that the following reference, at config.sgml line 1345, ought to
>>> be adjusted due to the introduction of the new checkpo
On 9 January 2012 18:47, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan
> wrote:
>> ISTM that the following reference, at config.sgml line 1345, ought to
>> be adjusted due to the introduction of the new checkpointer process:
>>
>> Setting this to zero disables
>>
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> ISTM that the following reference, at config.sgml line 1345, ought to
> be adjusted due to the introduction of the new checkpointer process:
>
> Setting this to zero disables
> background writing (except for checkpoint activity).
[Moving to -docs]
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> one czech user reported a bug in documentation -
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/plpgsql-trigger.html
>
> NEW
>
> Data type RECORD; variable holding the new database row for
> INSERT/UPDATE operatio
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Pool wrote:
> > Chapter 35.4, paragraph 4, of the PostgreSQL 9.0.1 Documentation says:
> >
> > Any collection of commands in the SQL language can be packaged together and
> > defined as a function. Besides SELECT queries, the commands
> I just made the wording more generic
Thanks much.
ˉ
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Pool wrote:
> Chapter 35.4, paragraph 4, of the PostgreSQL 9.0.1 Documentation says:
>
> Any collection of commands in the SQL language can be packaged together and
> defined as a function. Besides SELECT queries, the commands can include data
> modifica
karol dzięgielewski написа:
> Hi,
> Where can I find documentation in pdf format?
> Regards Karol Dzięgielewski
That's not a bug.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
--
Milen A. Radev
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our l
karol dzięgielewski wrote:
> Hi,
> Where can I find documentation in pdf format?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
//Magnus
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Maxim Britov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> maxim=# SELECT version()
> maxim-# SELECT version();
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "SELECT" at character 18
> СТРÐÐÐ 2: SELECT version();
> ^
What you typed there was a two-line query equivalent to
SELECT version() SELECT versi
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:57:22 +0200
Maxim Britov wrote:
> I read it
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/tutorial-accessdb.html
>
> I can't use examples:
Sorry, my I know my mistake now. :)
--
Maxim Britov
GnuPG KeyID 0x4580A6D66F3DB1FB xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 198171258
Finger
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 01:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Is it a good idea to provide an example (such as the above), or should I
> > > just try and describe the behavi
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 01:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Is it a good idea to provide an example (such as the above), or should I
> > just try and describe the behaviour?
>
> Examples are generally good things ...
OK, the attached documentation patch provides some simple examples of
use of tablename
Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I can't supply either %ROWTYPE or %TYPE within the parameter
> definition without an error either.
Looks like I was mistaken: table.field%type works, but table%type
does not:
test72=# create table foo (f1 int, f2 text);
CREATE
test72=# create fun
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 04:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Reading between a few lines I got the impression that the manual
> > suggested something like:
> > CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename%ROWTYPE ) RETURNS ...
> > When I finally got my function working, I
Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reading between a few lines I got the impression that the manual
> suggested something like:
> CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename%ROWTYPE ) RETURNS ...
> When I finally got my function working, I found I had:
> CREATE or REPLACE myfunc( tablename ) RE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Section 3.3, tutorial-fk.html
> You have written 'references weather' instead of 'references cities'.
This seems to be fixed already.
> Line 9 refers to 'advanced' instead of 'syscat' in syscat.py
Good catch, thanks for the report!
regards,
Rich Morin writes:
> It is a ToC entry, looking like
>
>"12.1.7. The #random# test ... 76"
>
> where the '#'s actually show up as squares.
Those are supposed to be double quotes. It's possible that the
Microsoftish "smart quotes" snuck in here. We'll be alert next time
around.
--
Peter
The peculiar codes (\223, \224) appear to be "character codes", but
not ones that seem very standardized. The "PostScript Language
Reference Manual" (2nd Ed.) gives the following information:
"E.6 StandardEncoding Encoding Vector", p. 598
"E.9 Expert Encoding Vector", p. 602
At 5:13 PM +0100 11/15/01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Rich Morin writes:
>
>> PostreSQL 7.1 Administrator's Guide
>>
>> On page iii (2nd line), something is printing as a square (?).
>
>Could you give some context? I don't have the specific document at hand.
It is a ToC entry, looking like
Rich Morin writes:
> PostreSQL 7.1 Administrator's Guide
>
>On page iii (2nd line), something is printing as a square (?).
Could you give some context? I don't have the specific document at hand.
> PostreSQL 7.1 Developer's Guide
>
>The Arabic page numbers do not match the actual page
>On page xv (antepenultimate line), "Gnu Project" should be "GNU
>Project".
Fixed. Thanks.
>On page 78, the "Release date" is listed as "2001-??-??".
This is a tough one. We generate the docs before we know the date of
final release. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to fix th
Tom Lane writes:
> >> Well, beside the referential constraint issue ( that can be solved by
> >> hand ), the most frustrating is that queries like
> >> DELETE FROM table* where key = some_value
> >> Fails ( parser error ). ( UPDATE either )
>
> Not as of 7.1.
>
> re
>> Well, beside the referential constraint issue ( that can be solved by
>> hand ), the most frustrating is that queries like
>> DELETE FROM table* where key = some_value
>> Fails ( parser error ). ( UPDATE either )
Not as of 7.1.
regards, tom lane
-
>
> Hi, i've posted various problems regarding inheritance in postgres,
> Never see a reply :(
>
> Well, beside the referential constraint issue ( that can be solved by
> hand ), the most frustrating is that queries like
>
> DELETE FROM table* where key = some_value
>
> Fails ( parser error )
This is fixed in 7.1.1.
> Hello:
>
> In version 7.1 the man page for pg_ctl does not document -s option.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Arcady Genkin
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/u
Thanks. Docs updated.
> The programmers guide states that in order to load the JDBC
> driver, you use the class name "postgresql.Driver"
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.0/programmer/jdbc6424.htm
>
> This is only true if you compile the driver to use the 1.1
> JDK; if you comp
Thanks. Fixed.
> Marius Kintel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 4
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> Documentation bug
>
> Long Description
> in file "user/app-psql.htm"
>
> \copy table [ with oids ] { from | to } filename | stdin | stdou
31 matches
Mail list logo
