Tom Lane wrote:
> "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAICS, int32 and int are exactly the same thing in PostgreSQL. For the
> > machine int is not 32 bits long, PostgreSQL won't even run.
>
> Ideally we should operate correctly if "int" is 64 bits. In practice
> I agree that making
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAICS, int32 and int are exactly the same thing in PostgreSQL. For the
> machine int is not 32 bits long, PostgreSQL won't even run.
Ideally we should operate correctly if "int" is 64 bits. In practice
I agree that making contrib work would be mighty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> In "g_int_compress" :
>
>
> int*dr;
> ...
> memmove((void *) &dr[cand - 1], (void *) &dr[cand + 1], (len - cand -
> 1) * sizeof(int));
>
> Should be
>
> int32 *dr;
> ...
> memmove((void *) &dr[cand - 1], (void *) &dr[cand + 1], (len - cand -
> 1)
