Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The second, adddepend.patch is what should be applied to the > contrib/adddepend/adddepend file Roger. Patch applied in both HEAD and REL7_3_STABLE branches. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Rod Taylor
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 18:57, Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Adams patch is good. Please apply when you find time. > > I'm a bit confused by the patch --- it has a patch against "upgrade.pl" > which is not to be seen in contrib/adddepend. What's up with that? It see

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And the name of the script was changed from original upgrade.pl to > adddepend, of course. Oh, I see. Looks like the README didn't get fixed for that change :-( Will take care of it. regards, tom lane ---

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Adam Buraczewski
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 06:57:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm a bit confused by the patch --- it has a patch against "upgrade.pl" > which is not to be seen in contrib/adddepend. What's up with that? I attached _two_ patches to my first posting -- one for upgrade.pl and one for adddepend. Both

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adams patch is good. Please apply when you find time. I'm a bit confused by the patch --- it has a patch against "upgrade.pl" which is not to be seen in contrib/adddepend. What's up with that? regards, tom lane --

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Rod Taylor
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 14:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It makes sense, but I've not tested it yet. > > Okay, I'll hold off applying until you check it. It's not urgent, > but I'd like to have it fixed in 7.3.1, which we'll doubtless be > wanting to roll out in a

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create multi-column foreign keys.

2002-12-01 Thread Adam Buraczewski
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:06:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I already notified the author of the program and attached patches to > > both original upgrade.pl and contrib/adddepend scripts. > Rod, do you concur that this is a correct patch? The patch

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create multi-column foreign keys.

2002-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It makes sense, but I've not tested it yet. Okay, I'll hold off applying until you check it. It's not urgent, but I'd like to have it fixed in 7.3.1, which we'll doubtless be wanting to roll out in a few weeks. regards, tom lane -

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create

2002-12-01 Thread Rod Taylor
It makes sense, but I've not tested it yet. On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 14:06, Tom Lane wrote: > Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Simply: the program takes column names from the wrong end of the array > > :) > > > I already notified the author of the program and attached patches to > >

Re: [BUGS] contrib/adddepend does not properly re-create multi-column foreign keys.

2002-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simply: the program takes column names from the wrong end of the array > :) > I already notified the author of the program and attached patches to > both original upgrade.pl and contrib/adddepend scripts. Rod, do you concur that this is a correct pat