The gcc 4.2.2 binaries for a number of HP-UX platforms can be
downloaded from here: http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/
And that does the job.
Thanks for pointing to the right direction.
Peter
On Feb 16, 2008 2:49 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Peter Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I
"Peter Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just completed a successful compilation with cc. Still, cc gave a lot
> of
> (Bundled) cc: warning 922: "-Ae" is unsupported in the bundled
> compiler, ignored.
> (Bundled) cc: warning 922: "+O2" is unsupported in the bundled
> compiler, ignored
Thank you, Tom, for you help.
The short gcc test you described gives the result you predicted.
I have just completed a successful compilation with cc. Still, cc gave a lot of
(Bundled) cc: warning 922: "-Ae" is unsupported in the bundled
compiler, ignored.
(Bundled) cc: warning 922: "+O2" is uns
"Peter Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bash-3.00# uname -a
> HP-UX apollo B.11.23 U ia64 1874023332 unlimited-user license
> I got the following warnings:
> checking sys/ipc.h presence... yes
> configure: WARNING: sys/ipc.h: present but cannot be compiled
Which compiler are you using? If
ssage -
From: "Devrim GUNDUZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aaron Clauson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Configure error on Openssl with Beta5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?
I've never installed 3.0 locally, but I have built --with-openssl
on RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 3, which bracket RHEL-3, and not noticed
any need to mess with kerberos include
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ?? I've not had to do that on any Red Hat machine I've used ...
> Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?
I've never installed 3.0 locally, but I have built --with-openssl
on RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 3, which brac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
ln -s /usr/kerberos/include/* /usr/include/
?? I've not had to do that on any Red Hat machine I've used ...
Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?
This problem was what I have experienced during RPM builds, mon
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote:
>> I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5
>> distribution when the --with-openssl option is used.
> ln -s /usr/kerberos/include/* /usr/include/
?? I've not had to do that on a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote:
Yes that fixed it. I don't know why? I was hunting around for anything to do
with ssl not with kerberos...
I could run the 7.4.6 configure without needing the symbolic link but perhaps
this is an issue res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote:
I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5
distribution when the --with-openssl option is used.
I am using Whitebox Linux and have tried reinstalling/removing all the
openssl
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:56:51AM -, Aaron Clauson wrote:
> I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5
> distribution when the --with-openssl option is used.
What's the exact configure command you're using and what error do
you get? What does the end of confi
"Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Noticed this when I had a typo on the configure command line. The configure
> script does not catch the following bogus option:
> --enable-bogosity
Complain to the Autoconf project. They strenuously insist this is not a
bug, and have done so for many
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:23, Fahad G. wrote:
>> I checked and I don't have 'readline' installed. --without-readline did the
>> trick, but shouldn't this be handled automatically?
> This is intentional
Indeed. A few releases back we did actually behave th
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:03:39PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:23, Fahad G. wrote:
> > I checked and I don't have 'readline' installed. --without-readline did the
> > trick, but shouldn't this be handled automatically?
>
> This is intentional -- what's wrong with stopping?
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:23, Fahad G. wrote:
> I checked and I don't have 'readline' installed. --without-readline did the
> trick, but shouldn't this be handled automatically?
This is intentional -- what's wrong with stopping? ISTM that stopping
and letting the user know what went wrong is probab
"Jim J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can not configure Beta 8.0.0beta1 on SuSE 9.1 kernel 2.6.5-7.104.
Looks to me like you're missing most or all of the standard headers
(/usr/include/ contents). A few packages shy of a full install maybe?
regards, tom lane
--
Matt Mackenzie writes:
> I looked @ the configure script and realised my problem was the lack of
> ncurses libs on my machine. I would respectfuly request a more
> informative readline not found. Perhaps the fix is just to place this in
> the readline part of the documentation.
I think it would
18 matches
Mail list logo
