Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: >> As in have a (hyptothetical) tracker being subscribed to -bugs (and maybe >> the other lists in the future as well) so the workflow would look like >> this: > > Well there is a WIP to use an ArchiveOpteryX

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: > As in have a (hyptothetical) tracker being subscribed to -bugs (and maybe > the other lists in the future as well) so the workflow would look like > this: Well there is a WIP to use an ArchiveOpteryX based solution to replace the archives and get rid of the artifici

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On mån, 2010-04-19 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > As far as I am concerned, this is just bellyaching. I'm glad Tom > fixes most of the bugs because otherwise we would have a lot more > unfixed bugs. But he's not from the only one who responds to bug > reports, and we seem to have a pretty g

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On mån, 2010-04-19 at 09:59 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> I think we would not even need to expose the webinterface to the wider >> community, what we probably want is something that let's us keep the >> current workflow but provid

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> IME many of the bugs that go unanswered are non-bugs (eg #5316) >> or inadequately described (eg #5429) > > Agreed. > >> If the goal is "make sure nothing important slips through the >> cracks", a tracker could help.  

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Tom Lane wrote: > IME many of the bugs that go unanswered are non-bugs (eg #5316) > or inadequately described (eg #5429) Agreed. > If the goal is "make sure nothing important slips through the > cracks", a tracker could help. If the goal is "100% response rate > to pgsql-bugs submissions",

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Jaime Casanova writes: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> What is frustrating about the current process is that ~5% of the bugs don't >> get a response.  How are we going to fix that problem? > that's a two side problem, while certainly there are valid bug reports > that f

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Despite all the problems with PostgreSQL's bug-tracking system or non-system, I've found it much nicer to deal with than OpenOffice's. I really like the fact that it's e-mail based rather than web based. Part of the reason for that is that I have e-mail but not web access, so I can deal with it

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On mån, 2010-04-19 at 09:59 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > I think we would not even need to expose the webinterface to the wider > community, what we probably want is something that let's us keep the > current workflow but provides a minimalistic > status/statistics/dashboard > feature on

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On sön, 2010-04-18 at 19:47 +, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using > > something other than Bugzilla for the tracker. I'm not really sure if > > there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, but I've > > always found Bug

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > 2a. we can simply have the tracker export a dashboard status of: > > *) stuff that had no reply too (which is one of the open questions) > *) if a commit has the bug id we could have it autoclose/autotrack that > as well > > 2b. for the case of "not a bug"/"added to

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > by nagging people - if we simply had a dashboard or an email interface > (think of the buildfarm dashboard and the status email reports it > provides to both developers and animalowners) to make the issue more > visible I think most of the problem of "no reply at all"

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane wrote: Jaime Casanova writes: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Bugzilla is the worst form of

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Tom Lane wrote: Jaime Casanova writes: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for all the others. One of these days, I am going to write a @$#! bug tracker.

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Jasen Betts wrote: On 2010-04-10, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Craig Ringer wrote: Dave Page wrote: This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - now see what you made me do :-( Please?

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Robert Haas wrote: [...] > What is frustrating about the current process is that ~5% of the bugs don't > get a response.  How are we going to fix that problem? > that's a two side problem, while certainly there are valid bug reports that fall in the cracks, there

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane wrote: >> Jaime Casanova writes: >>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Bugzilla is the worst form of

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for all the others. flyspray isn't half bad, especially because its really simple and fairly clean. supports pgsql too. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make chang

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane wrote: > Jaime Casanova writes: >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane >>> wrote: Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for all the others. >>> >>>

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Jaime Casanova writes: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane >> wrote: >>> Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for >>> all the others. >> >> One of these days, I am going to write a @$#! bug tracke

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane > wrote: >>> That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using >>> something other than Bugzilla for the tracker.  I'm not really sure if >>> there's anything that I'd con

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using >> something other than Bugzilla for the tracker.  I'm not really sure if >> there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, but I've >> always found Bugzilla

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using > something other than Bugzilla for the tracker. I'm not really sure if > there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, but I've > always found Bugzilla pretty ter

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On sön, 2010-04-18 at 13:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using > something other than Bugzilla for the tracker. I'm not really sure if > there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, There isn't. Welcome to the show. ;-)

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Jasen Betts wrote: >> >> On 2010-04-10, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>> >>> Craig Ringer wrote: Dave Page wrote: > This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - > now see what you made me

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Jasen Betts wrote: On 2010-04-10, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Craig Ringer wrote: Dave Page wrote: This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - now see what you made me do :-( Please?!? I wonder, if EDB just went ahead and set one up, would people start using it? I

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On 2010-04-10, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Craig Ringer wrote: >> Dave Page wrote: >> >>> This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - >>> now see what you made me do :-( >> >> Please?!? >> >> I wonder, if EDB just went ahead and set one up, would people start >> usin

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Craig Ringer wrote: Dave Page wrote: This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - now see what you made me do :-( Please?!? I wonder, if EDB just went ahead and set one up, would people start using it? I've been tempted to do it myself, but I'm not confident I can ha

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Dave Page wrote: > This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - > now see what you made me do :-( Please?!? I wonder, if EDB just went ahead and set one up, would people start using it? I've been tempted to do it myself, but I'm not confident I can handle the bandwidth/h

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Andy Balholm wrote: > On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> Something is wrong with this >> mailing list. > > In the week and a half that I've been subscribed to this mailing > list, there have been several times that I received a reply to a > message without receiving the origina

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Andy Balholm wrote: > On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> Something is wrong with this mailing list. > > In the week and a half that I've been subscribed to this mailing > list, there have been several times that I received a reply to a > message without receiving the original

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Something is wrong with this > mailing list. In the week and a half that I've been subscribed to this mailing list, there have been several times that I received a reply to a message without receiving the original message. In most cases, I rece

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> BUG #5287: ispell dict erroneously returns lexeme on all prefix+suffix >> cross products >> BUG #5300: Bug on Mac OS X 10.6 and Postgres 8.4 >> BUG #5316: not handled error in inherit queri

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > BUG #5287: ispell dict erroneously returns lexeme on all prefix+suffix > cross products > BUG #5300: Bug on Mac OS X 10.6 and Postgres 8.4 > BUG #5316: not handled error in inherit queries > BUG #5335: GUC value lost on exception > BUG #4785:

Re: [BUGS] Bugs

"Abhay Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I am installing the Postgis 2.2.1 on PostgreSQL. I think you would be better off speaking to this mailing list: http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprise

Re: [BUGS] {BUGS] BUG #3110: Online Backup introduces Duplicate OIDs

> Question for Randy -- is this plain PostgreSQL, or are you using some, > hmmm, proprietary derivate of it? Good question, but this is the plain vanilla version of 8.2.3. My latest intel says the proprietary derivative in not currently available at 8.2.3. - r. Randy Isbell Technical Lead

Re: [BUGS] BUGs for function returning a SETOF values on linux postgres 8.0.4, the same function runs correctly on win postgres 8.1

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:53:44PM -0700, Susan Fu wrote: > I am trying to run a very simple test on the above version. This test > works fine on my window 8.1 version. > If I am taking out the function on the 8.0.4 version on linux as just > the select (SELECT DISTINCT value FROM colors) I can see

Re: [BUGS] BUGs for function returning a SETOF values on linux postgres 8.0.4, the same function runs correctly on win postgres 8.1

"Susan Fu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Failed to execute SQL : SQL select * from tt(); failed : ERROR: control = > reached end of function without RETURN CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "tt" This is not a bug. 8.0 requires a RETURN in all cases. 8.1 is laxer about it. rega

Re: [BUGS] BUGS

On 5/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am trying to get some help around this, i couldnt find anywhere not on > cygwin.com or anywhere else and i also saw that many others have the same > problem on forums but no replies. please help : > thanks in advance > > > creating con

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in bigint indexes

Title: Message Try this    explain SELECT id FROM it_test WHERE id='123'; QUERY PLAN Index Scan using it_test_pkey on it_test  (cost=0.00..4.82 rows=1 width=8)   Index Cond: (id = 123

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in bigint indexes

Nishad Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why doesn't the query planner notice that an int-type index is present > and perform the cast on its own? Perhaps one of the developers > can explain? I think users would like this property if it could be > implemented without breaking anything. It's

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in bigint indexes

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Gustavo Scotti wrote: > > _ > > > Dear developers, > > I almost got nuts those two days I'm stuck with this issue... > Let's get straight to the point. I'm using a small portion of my actual > table, but this is enough.

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in bigint indexes

Gustavo Scotti writes: > when the key is bigint, it ignores any kind of index scan, it always use > Seq scan. Why? RTFM: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/datatype.html#DATATYPE-INT Please don't post to pgsql-bugs unless you have found a bug. ---(end of broadcast

Re: [BUGS] Bugs or Error?

Ninonard Policarpio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What i did is i install the postgresql 7.2.1mlx for libs, posgresql, and > server What in the world is "postgresql 7.2.1mlx" ? > "NOTICE: write error may be permanent: cannot write block 10 for 22892/1249 > ERROR: cannot write block 10 of 22892

Re: [BUGS] Bugs with rules on views/tables: permission denied

  - Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Donald Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "[BUGS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:29 PM Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bugs with rules on views/tables: permiss

Re: [BUGS] Bugs with rules on views/tables: permission denied

"Donald Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As USER chkrule do: > Bugs=3D> INSERT INTO vu_tbl_test (id, s_text) VALUES('1','sometext'); > ERROR: vu_tbl_test: permission denied What I get is ERROR: test_func: permission denied and the needed fix is to grant execute privilege on the fun

Re: [BUGS] Bugs with rules on views/tables: permission denied

- Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "Donald Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: "[ADMIN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:42 PMSubject: Re: [ADMIN] Bugs with rules on views/tables: permission denied > "Donald Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write

Re: [BUGS] bugs

Srinivasa R Chava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm using postgresql 7.2 > There is a bug in pg_restore. It is not restoring the sequences > properly. and it is failing with views created by pgadmin tool. This is not a bug in pg_restore, but in pg_dump: it's emitting the stuff in the wrong order.

Re: [BUGS] Bugs on COPY command

> I currently using postgresql V7.0.3. > I created a database with UNICODE encoding to store chinese and japanese information. > I have some chinese information created with MS access(excel) and export it to text >file > with delimiter semi-colon ";" . > When I imiport the text file into the tabl

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in to_char function

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > "Tom Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [to_char] gives the correct meridian value for all AM times but incorrectly > > returns an AM meridian for PM times between 12:00 PM and 1:50:59 PM. > > I believe this is a known bug in the 7.0 implementation of

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in to_char function

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Tom Rogers wrote: > I wanted to include the following in a select statement: > > to_char(departtime, 'HH12:MI PM') as xdepart Very old story and already fixed in the current CVS. Wait for great 7.1 :-) Karel PS. has this list so

Re: [BUGS] Bugs in to_char function

"Tom Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [to_char] gives the correct meridian value for all AM times but incorrectly > returns an AM meridian for PM times between 12:00 PM and 1:50:59 PM. I believe this is a known bug in the 7.0 implementation of to_char, and is long since fixed in development

Re: [BUGS] bugs

Yes, right now references constraints require update permissions on the table being referenced in order to grab row level locks on it with SELECT FOR UPDATE. Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Alexei E. Korneyev wrote: > ==