I have applied the following patch to fix this, hopefully.
---
John R Pierce wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>Here's what I see in REL8_0_STABLE
> >>>and in HEAD (s_lock.c 1.35):
> >>>
> >>>244 #ifdef SUNOS4_CC
> >>>245 asm
Tom Lane wrote:
Here's what I see in REL8_0_STABLE
and in HEAD (s_lock.c 1.35):
244 #ifdef SUNOS4_CC
245 asm(".seg \"data\"");
246 asm(".seg \"text\"");
247 #else
248 asm(".section \"data\"");
249 asm(".section \"text\"");
250 #endif
I see that template/sunos4 adds -DSUNOS4_CC
>> Here's what I see in REL8_0_STABLE
>> and in HEAD (s_lock.c 1.35):
>>
>> 244 #ifdef SUNOS4_CC
>> 245 asm(".seg \"data\"");
>> 246 asm(".seg \"text\"");
>> 247 #else
>> 248 asm(".section \"data\"");
>> 249 asm(".section \"text\"");
>> 250 #endif
I see that template/sunos4 adds -
I have seen that.
The question is: Gcc seems to get it right ;).
In my little world two compiler should handle this the same but I have
learned that Sun is in many cases different world ...
1+1 is always 2 - on Sun it could also be 3 ;).
hans
Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> I have some minor troubles when using the Sun Compiler 9 on Solaris 9.
> The spinlock assembler code is somehow broken for Solaris 9 and Solaris
> 10 (it works for Sun CC 8).
>
> The following patch fixes this:
>
> [EMAIL PRO
