raf writes:
> does this mean that "select srf()" is no longer deprecated?
Well, it's got various issues --- in particular it's not real clear what
should happen if there's more than one SRF in a select list. It's
unlikely to go away though, especially not before we have an adequate
replacement.
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> this limit will be removed at 8.4
>
> in older version you have to use table notation like
>
> select * from srf()
>
> regards
> Pavel Stehule
hi,
that's funny. the 8.3 documentation i read said that in the
future you'd probably have to use "select * from srf
Hello
this limit will be removed at 8.4
in older version you have to use table notation like
select * from srf()
regards
Pavel Stehule
2009/2/10 Daniel Migowski :
> Hello dear PostgreSQL developers,
>
> I noticed the following strange behaviour with set-returning functions. If
> sets are allow
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:04:02AM +0100, Daniel Migowski wrote:
> SELECT y(); -- fails with:
when you return set, you should use:
select * from y();
select function() is additional feature of sql functions.
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
