Re: [BUGS] Segmentation Fault V 9.1.5

2012-08-30 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 30 August 2012 22:42, Jeff Lake wrote: > Lack even basic manners?? > I have been at installing this for 3 days > manners/patience is gone!! That's not my problem. Projecting your frustration on this mailing list isn't cool, and, along with your poor description of the problem, is a sure way to

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation Fault V 9.1.5

2012-08-30 Thread Jeff Lake
Lack even basic manners?? I have been at installing this for 3 days manners/patience is gone!! lets see MySql works , Oracle works... install PostgreSQL nope it don't work, either using Command line, php, for the hell of I tried perl nope all fail, all segmentation fault so what would that say

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation Fault V 9.1.5

2012-08-30 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 30 August 2012 20:29, Jeff Lake wrote: > I have looked at darn near every listing for this bug .. > "..because curl is loaded before postgresql" << nope didn't work > here is my system specs This must be the worst bug report I've ever seen. I'd give the usual link to "How to Report Bugs Effec

Re: [BUGS] segmentation fault on Dynamic query using C

2009-01-22 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:40:22AM +0530, Priyank Raj wrote: > I have a code(mention below), when i run this code on Intel machine it works > perfectly fine, but when i use AMD machine it giving me segmentation fault > at "EXEC SQL EXECUTE IMMEDIATE :qqq;" line. what could be the problem?? Difficu

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault in psql

2001-06-13 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > sql-# \a? > Output format is aligned. > \a: extra argument '?' ignored > Segmentation fault > $ psql 7.1.1? If so, this is a minor bug that slipped into psql for about two days at just the wrong time :-(. Update to 7.1.2. regards, tom lane -

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault when changing view

2001-04-16 Thread Tom Lane
Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i just created new database and ran this script. > First time the query ran okay, then i removed ps.quantity > and re-created package_tree_view. > After this the query crashed the server. Hmm, I see: there's not a defense against references to no-longer

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault when changing view

2001-04-16 Thread Tom Lane
Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible to get core file, i couldn't find how to setup this. A crashed backend should leave a core file in $PGDATA/base/YOURDB/core If you don't see a core file in that directory, it's possible that the postmaster was started with "ulimit -c 0"

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault when changing view

2001-04-16 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Segmentation fault when changing view I ran this script and didn't see any problem ... In general though, whenever you drop/recreate a view you are going to have to drop/recreate views that refer to it, too. regards, tom lane

Re: [BUGS] segmentation fault in psql

2001-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
David George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks. Removing sfio from configure.in and reconfiguring/making did > the job. I didn't try it before because I figured Postgresql may have > actually been using sfio for something. No; I'm not sure why it's in configure's search list at all. It soun

Re: [BUGS] segmentation fault in psql

2001-03-31 Thread David George
Tom Lane wrote: > Uh, what are sfio and stdio anyway, and why would we want them? putc is > in plain old libc in every system I've dealt with. If you remove both > sfio and stdio from configure, does it work any better? Thanks. Removing sfio from configure.in and reconfiguring/making did the

Re: [BUGS] segmentation fault in psql

2001-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
David George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is a backtrace with debug enabled: > (gdb) bt > #0 0x446cc in putc () > #1 0x26748 in print_aligned_text (title=0x0, headers=0x746d0, > cells=0x746e0, footers=0x746f0, opt_align=0x74700 "l", > opt_barebones=0 '\000', opt_border=1, fout=0x68458)

Re: [BUGS] segmentation fault in psql

2001-03-31 Thread David George
Tom Lane wrote: > Can't tell a lot from that. Could you rebuild psql with debug symbols > so we can see a more complete backtrace? Here is a backtrace with debug enabled: (gdb) bt #0 0x446cc in putc () #1 0x26748 in print_aligned_text (title=0x0, headers=0x746d0, cells=0x746e0, footers=0x746f

Re: [BUGS] segmentation fault in psql

2001-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
David George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: > (gdb) bt > #0 0x274a8 in putc () > #1 0x21044 in print_aligned_text () > #2 0x23360 in printTable () > #3 0x23a44 in printQuery () > #4 0x18820 in SendQuery () > #5 0x1b044 in MainLoop () > #6 0x1d5a8 in main () > (gdb) Can't tell a lot from that.

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault.

2000-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
"Andrei N.Sobchuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SELECT "object"."id_object" FROM "object" WHERE "status" = 1 ) AND > ("tel" = 1 ) ) ) ) ) AND NOT(EXISTS (SELECT "po"."id_person" FROM > "person_object" "po" WHERE (("po"."id_person" = 17 ) AND ("po"."id_object" = > "object"."id_object" )

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault.

2000-08-14 Thread Andrei N.Sobchuck
> "Andrei N.Sobchuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But one query fails when I use search on boolean field. > > What's the query exactly? I don't see any evidence in your backtrace > that the function is being invoked, so I doubt that has anything to do > with the problem. I'm using PostgreSQL

Re: [BUGS] Segmentation fault.

2000-08-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Andrei N.Sobchuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But one query fails when I use search on boolean field. What's the query exactly? I don't see any evidence in your backtrace that the function is being invoked, so I doubt that has anything to do with the problem. regards