Re: [BUGS] Problem with ecpg

2000-06-13 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone comment on this patch? >> This forbids ":" to be the second (or above) char in an operator. >> Is there any situation where it should be? It would surely be intolerable for ecpg to have different ideas about what is an operator name than th

Re: [BUGS] Problem with ecpg

2000-06-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Can someone comment on this patch? > > > POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE > > > > > Your name : Berna