Re: [BUGS] Problem with domains

2003-09-25 Thread Robert Creager
Once upon a time (Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:28:29 -0400) Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered something amazingly similar to: > Robert Creager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Seems like the correct behavior to me. When CONSTRAINT is given, the > >> name is not optional AFAICS. > > > True, but the seco

Re: [BUGS] Problem with domains

2003-09-24 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Robert Creager wrote: > Once upon a time (Wed, 24 Sep 2003 21:10:53 -0700 (PDT)) > Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered something amazingly similar > to: > > > > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Sent for user who is having trouble posting to bugs list

Re: [BUGS] Problem with domains

2003-09-24 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Creager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Seems like the correct behavior to me. When CONSTRAINT is given, the >> name is not optional AFAICS. > True, but the second CREATE DOMAIN, which is a valid form, fails when > preceded by the invalid form. This was the error I was referring to. > Not t

Re: [BUGS] Problem with domains

2003-09-24 Thread Robert Creager
Once upon a time (Wed, 24 Sep 2003 21:10:53 -0700 (PDT)) Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered something amazingly similar to: > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Sent for user who is having trouble posting to bugs list: > > Seems like the correct behavior to me. When CONSTR

Re: [BUGS] Problem with domains

2003-09-24 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Sent for user who is having trouble posting to bugs list: Seems like the correct behavior to me. When CONSTRAINT is given, the name is not optional AFAICS. >From SQL99: ::= CREATE DOMAIN [ AS ] [ ] [ ... ] [ ] ::= [ ] [ ] ::= CONSTRAINT