On 03/05/10 01:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Russell Smith writes:
>
>> On 02/05/10 01:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> No, that's the intended place for them given the current division of
>>> labor between pg_dump and pg_dumpall. There have been complaints before
>>> about this, but no one has propose
Russell Smith writes:
> On 02/05/10 01:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, that's the intended place for them given the current division of
>> labor between pg_dump and pg_dumpall. There have been complaints before
>> about this, but no one has proposed a better approach (where better
>> means "fixes this
On 02/05/10 01:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> Russell Smith writes:
>
>> Is this considered a bug that the only way to do a dump/restore with
>> database privileges is to use pg_dumpall?
>>
> No, that's the intended place for them given the current division of
> labor between pg_dump and pg_dumpall
Russell Smith writes:
> Is this considered a bug that the only way to do a dump/restore with
> database privileges is to use pg_dumpall?
No, that's the intended place for them given the current division of
labor between pg_dump and pg_dumpall. There have been complaints before
about this, but no
