On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
wrote:
>>It was built on an
>>entirely different machine than any of the core postgresql binaries in
>>the release packages.
>
> Ok. I got it :-)
>
> However, the binaries I download from the postgres site didn't work without
> the microsoft p
>It was built on an
>entirely different machine than any of the core postgresql binaries in
>the release packages.
Ok. I got it :-)
However, the binaries I download from the postgres site didn't work without
the microsoft patch indicated into that email : is this an expected
behaviour?
Thank you
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
wrote:
>>That shouldn't be the problem
>
> I dont' think I've understood. What is the difference between the files
> installed by the installer and the zip archive?
>
> Thank you a lot!
Nothing - but the email you referenced was discussing a
Hi Dave,
>If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say you either installed PostgreSQL
>using the zip archive of the binaries
That's exactly what I've done!
My product installation installs postgresql and than creates a window
service through the pg_ctl command.
Without that patch, none of the postgres
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
wrote:
> I'm truly sorry.
>
> A while after I sent the e-mail I found the solution.
It's no problem - happens to all of us!
> Look here :
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgadmin-support/2009-09/msg00077.php
That shouldn't be the problem.
I'm truly sorry.
A while after I sent the e-mail I found the solution.
Look here :
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgadmin-support/2009-09/msg00077.php
Thanks,
Massimiliano
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi <
massimiliano.zicca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Running ev
