Re: [BUGS] Performance and 72.devel

2001-09-27 Thread John Summerfield
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Or if it is reusing them, it's renaming them too. > > That is what the "recycling..." message is all about... > 1) Why rename them? 2) Does anyone have a better idea how it floods my cache? I'll try again w

Re: [BUGS] Performance and 72.devel

2001-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or if it is reusing them, it's renaming them too. That is what the "recycling..." message is all about... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the

Re: [BUGS] Performance and 72.devel

2001-09-18 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > ... > > I think that if it actually reused them instead of deleting old files... > > That is in fact what it does for at least the upcoming 7.2 release. > > It's not what I see now in 7.2devel. Unless the changes are uncommitted (or commited in the

Re: [BUGS] Performance and 72.devel

2001-09-17 Thread Thomas Lockhart
... > I think that if it actually reused them instead of deleting old files... That is in fact what it does for at least the upcoming 7.2 release. - Thomas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? htt