Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
Dave Page wrote:
It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems bogus:
Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the
error message. This is what I came up with:
Why does it need to be anything exce
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems
>> bogus:
> Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the
> error message. This is what I came up with:
Why does it need to be anything except GUC's
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems
>> bogus:
>
> Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the
> error message. This is what I came up with:
>
> invalid connection limit %d (must be -1, m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:16:37PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
[...]
>> Maybe
>>invalid connection limit %d (must be positive or -1, for "unlimited")
>
> Hmm, that sounds better, but it can also be 0.
Oops. "nonnegative", then. Creeping unrea
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:26:05PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems
bogus:
Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the error
message. This is what I came u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:26:05PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems
>> bogus:
>
> Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the error
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems
>> bogus:
>
> Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the error
> message. This is what I came up with:
>
> invalid
Dave Page wrote:
It's possible to set a per-database connection limit of < -1, which seems bogus:
Yeah. That's simple to fix, but I'm having trouble wordsmithing the
error message. This is what I came up with:
invalid connection limit %d (must be -1, meaning no limit, or greater)
Any better