Re: [BUGS] Implicit cast of literal in SQL statements

2001-12-27 Thread Scott Royston
I've got some 'legacy' code that I'm dealing with - sometimes it will receive query requests that are simply the union of two easier requests it already knows the sql for. These 'easier' queries have 'distincts' in them, and the code doesn't go to the trouble of removing by hand when doing a un

Re: [BUGS] Implicit cast of literal in SQL statements

2001-12-27 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've seen a few postings in multiple newsgroups saying that in 7.1.x and > up, literals in SQL statements are implicitly cast to strings. That's an oversimplification: the implicit coercion of unknown literals only happens when looking for an operator

Re: [BUGS] Implicit cast of literal in SQL statements

2001-12-27 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> I've seen a few postings in multiple newsgroups saying that in 7.1.x and > up, literals in SQL statements are implicitly cast to strings. In some contexts, that statement is true, yes. The cases where this is true is when the parser is trying to match literals with available function calls. If