Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
> Cédric Villemain wrote:
>
>> Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>
>>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Schildknecht?=
>>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
It seems the shell command createuser and the SQL CREATE USER don't act
the sam
Cédric Villemain wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Schildknecht?=
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It seems the shell command createuser and the SQL CREATE USER don't act
> > > the same way,
> >
> > They aren't really claimed to.
>
> But the
Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007, Cédric Villemain a écrit :
> Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Schildknecht?=
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It seems the shell command createuser and the SQL CREATE USER don't act
> > > the same way,
> >
> > They aren
Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007, Tom Lane a écrit :
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Schildknecht?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems the shell command createuser and the SQL CREATE USER don't act
> > the same way,
>
> They aren't really claimed to.
But the man say :
" createuser is a wrapper arou
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Schildknecht?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems the shell command createuser and the SQL CREATE USER don't act
> the same way,
They aren't really claimed to. But the difference you point to is
irrelevant, since a superuser has createrole and createdb privilege
(and