Re: [BUGS] COPY BINARY broken on Linux/AXP

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a way to reflect that fact in /src/test/regress/resultmap so > that the results of both glibc<2.2.3 and glibc>=2.2.3 get compared > with thir respective expected results? Hmm. We currently have mechanisms for allowing result files to vary depen

Re: [BUGS] COPY BINARY broken on Linux/AXP

2001-06-27 Thread Tom Lane
Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I suspect that the newer versions of gcc or glibc are the source of > these problems. Let's see what our Alpha experts say about this... Okay. If it proves to be a portability problem rather than a compiler bug, let us know ... >> Could you look at the

Re: [BUGS] COPY BINARY broken on Linux/AXP

2001-06-27 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On SuSE Linux for the Alpha(AXP) architecture 'COPY BINARY FROM' > seems not to be able to read a file that was generated by > 'COPY BINARY TO' before. Hmm. The regression tests do pass on other Linux/Alpha platforms. Could you look at the generated file and see if it