Re: [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version

2001-09-10 Thread John Summerfield
> Tom Lane writes: > > > > What we probably want is some configure switch that switches between the > > > current behaviour and the behaviour you want. > > > > I'd suggest --prefix-like options to determine installation locations > > for the perl and python modules, > > Basically, I was envision

Re: [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version

2001-09-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > > What we probably want is some configure switch that switches between the > > current behaviour and the behaviour you want. > > I'd suggest --prefix-like options to determine installation locations > for the perl and python modules, Basically, I was envisioning some option li

Re: [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version

2001-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is a very valid concern, and it's been bugging us, too. The problem > is that by default, the majority of users would probably want the Perl and > Python modules to be put in the default place where they're easy to find > for the interpreter. (

Re: [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version

2001-09-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
John Summerfield writes: > To my dismay some components don't honour the "--prefix=/tmp/postgresql" > specification and try to install in some other location. > > I'd much prefer for the perl and python components to install into the > location I specified, and to leave me to discuss with Perl a