> > I tend to think that the functionality to give comments to databases
> > should either be redone to work right (for example by storing the comment
> > in a global table (but think about the encoding problems)) or be ripped
> > out. Right now the feature to give a comment to a database you pres
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Do we have psql -l to connect to all the databases to collect comments?
> > I guess we could _try_ to connect to as many databases as possible, but
> > it seems a little overly complex to me. What do others think?
>
> I tend to think that the
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Do we have psql -l to connect to all the databases to collect comments?
> I guess we could _try_ to connect to as many databases as possible, but
> it seems a little overly complex to me. What do others think?
I tend to think that the functionality to give comments to dat
Bhuvan A wrote:
> > Long Description PostgreSQL has mechanism for commenting databases.
> > Database comments can by read by obj_description(oid), psql \l+ command
> > use it. Database comments should be global, but they are not, when we do
> > \l+ on one database, and then on other, results will b
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 06:16, Bhuvan A wrote:
> > Long Description PostgreSQL has mechanism for commenting databases.
> > Database comments can by read by obj_description(oid), psql \l+ command
> > use it. Database comments should be global, but they are not, when we do
> > \l+ on one database, and
> Long Description PostgreSQL has mechanism for commenting databases.
> Database comments can by read by obj_description(oid), psql \l+ command
> use it. Database comments should be global, but they are not, when we do
> \l+ on one database, and then on other, results will be different. I
> conside
