Hi, Craig,
Thanks a lot for your response. Sorry to make the bug report so long... I
was a little pissed off by myself for my stupidness after spending around 2
hours on this issue.
Yes, your message is definitely better and explicit by pointing out CWD.
The only concern to me is whether or not
On 10/28/2012 03:35 PM, t...@cs.ucsd.edu wrote:
> I really suggest to make the configuration file consistent in this case. But
> I understand it might not be easy. But at least I think we should print a
> better log message which pinpoints to the absolute path like
>
> FATAL: 58P01: could not cre
