yes, I could not figure out why my GIN index was not used, this is what
i meant.
On 09/04/12 18:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
We do have this:
The operators&&,@> and
<@ are equivalent toPostgreSQL's built-in
operators of the same names, except that they work only o
Robert Haas writes:
> We do have this:
>
>The operators &&, @> and
><@ are equivalent to PostgreSQL's built-in
>operators of the same names, except that they work only on integer arrays
>that do not contain nulls, while the built-in operators work for any array
>type. This
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:12 PM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6530
> Logged by: Kasper Sandberg
> Email address: kont...@sandberg-consult.dk
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
> Operating system: Debian squeeze
> Description:
>
> Hell
