Thanks for the quick response. Linux's top fooled me quite a bit.
Excuse me for the false report.
Best regards,
Otto
2011/12/29 Tom Lane
> havasvolgyi.o...@gmail.com writes:
> > The following bug has been logged on the website:
> > Bug reference: 6365
> > Logged by: Otto Havasvöl
Merlin Moncure writes:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I see no memory leak with this example.
> This is by the way a FAQ:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_does_PostgreSQL_use_so_much_memory.3F
Well, to be fair, the FAQ entry didn't mention this behavior of report
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> havasvolgyi.o...@gmail.com writes:
>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>> Bug reference: 6365
>> Logged by: Otto Havasvölgyi
>> Email address: havasvolgyi.o...@gmail.com
>> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2
>> Operating
havasvolgyi.o...@gmail.com writes:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
> Bug reference: 6365
> Logged by: Otto Havasvölgyi
> Email address: havasvolgyi.o...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2
> Operating system: Win XP SP2 x86; Linux Debian 2.6.32 kernel x64
