Craig Ringer writes:
> On 21/09/2011 4:25 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I added my initial patch, and as far as I understand, I have to send
>> the revised patch to the list before I can register it at the
>> commitfest. So here is my revised patch, that uses "const char *const * "
>> like else
On 21/09/2011 4:25 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I added my initial patch, and as far as I understand, I have to send
the revised patch to the list before I can register it at the
commitfest. So here is my revised patch, that uses "const char *const * "
like elsewhere in the same file instead of
ghtOn Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 07:29:23AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 21/09/2011 12:05 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>Bug reference: 6216
>>Logged by: Lionel Elie Mamane
>>Email address: lio...@mamane.lu
>> In C++, a "char**" value is not convertible to a "const char**"
>> val
Craig Ringer writes:
> As for wording: my *personal* preference is "const char * const" but I
> don't know what the opinions of those who work with the code day-to-day are.
+1. Isn't the other ordering deprecated by recent C standards?
(Or maybe I'm just thinking of where you're supposed to put
On 21/09/2011 12:05 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6216
Logged by: Lionel Elie Mamane
Email address: lio...@mamane.lu
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.0
Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux
Description:Calling PQconnectdbP
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 6216
> Logged by: Lionel Elie Mamane
> Email address: lio...@mamane.lu
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.0
> Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux
> Description:
