Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-15 Thread Magnus Hagander
Joe Conway wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Could this be somethingl ike missing PGDLLIMPORT specifications in > > your addon module or something like that? Try checking the names of > > the functions that are actually exported using "depends" or a > > similar tool. > > Ah, that sounds likely,

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-14 Thread Joe Conway
Magnus Hagander wrote: Could this be somethingl ike missing PGDLLIMPORT specifications in your addon module or something like that? Try checking the names of the functions that are actually exported using "depends" or a similar tool. Ah, that sounds likely, since I have never had to worry abou

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
Joe Conway wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: In general, mingw built modules should load just fine in msvc built postgres. AFAIK, that's how PostGIS does it for 8.3 (though I know Mark is working on getting MSVC build support for them). Debugging may be a bit harder (since they use different kinds o

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-13 Thread Joe Conway
Magnus Hagander wrote: In general, mingw built modules should load just fine in msvc built postgres. AFAIK, that's how PostGIS does it for 8.3 (though I know Mark is working on getting MSVC build support for them). Debugging may be a bit harder (since they use different kinds of debug symbols - p

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-06 Thread Magnus Hagander
Joe Conway wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mike Leahy wrote: > >> > Is this actually a bug, or is there a specific reason that the > >> > pgxs files omitted in the windows installer? I noticed the > >> > 8.3.1 in

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-06 Thread Joe Conway
Dave Page wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike Leahy wrote: > Is this actually a bug, or is there a specific reason that the pgxs > files omitted in the windows installer? I noticed the 8.3.1 installer > has been posted (as the updates had a

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-03-18 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Leahy wrote: > > Is this actually a bug, or is there a specific reason that the pgxs > > files omitted in the windows installer? I noticed the 8.3.1 installer > > has been posted (as the updates had appeared on m

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-03-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Mike Leahy wrote: > Is this actually a bug, or is there a specific reason that the pgxs > files omitted in the windows installer? I noticed the 8.3.1 installer > has been posted (as the updates had appeared on my linux machines). From > what I can tell, the 8.3.1 version of the win32 installe

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-03-17 Thread Mike Leahy
Is this actually a bug, or is there a specific reason that the pgxs files omitted in the windows installer? I noticed the 8.3.1 installer has been posted (as the updates had appeared on my linux machines). From what I can tell, the 8.3.1 version of the win32 installer is still missing pgxs.mk