Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have thought before that we were overloading fn_extra a bit too much.
> Is there any merit in having more than one "extra" member in FmgrInfo
> going forward?
Not sure what --- how would you decide which to use, and what stops
there being a conflict on
Tom Lane wrote:
"Ezequiel Tolnay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've created the cardnumber_t datatype, which is an int8, to provide
implicit typecasting with varchar padding the result with zeroes.
Conversions work as expected between int4, int8, cardnumber_t and varchar.
They also work fine between
"Ezequiel Tolnay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've created the cardnumber_t datatype, which is an int8, to provide
> implicit typecasting with varchar padding the result with zeroes.
> Conversions work as expected between int4, int8, cardnumber_t and varchar.
> They also work fine between int4[],