Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this:
> alter table foobar add column address varchar(50) default 'none';
> is the incorrect syntax, why does it not fail or at least give a
> warning?
Because it's incompletely implemented: the parser takes the full syntax
but the ALTER TABLE rout
On 8 May 2001, Nabil Sayegh wrote:
> On 05 May 2001 12:23:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Vince Vielhaber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> > The lower the number the more severe it is.
> >
> > Short Description
> > Alter table add column ignores default
> >
> > Long
On 8 May 2001, Nabil Sayegh wrote:
> On 08 May 2001 10:31:17 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > http://hermes.swu.bg/postgres/postgres/sql-altertable.htm
> > > The correct syntax is:
> > > ALTER TABLE foobar add column address varchar(50);
> > > ALTER TABLE foobar alter column address set defaul
On 08 May 2001 10:31:17 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > http://hermes.swu.bg/postgres/postgres/sql-altertable.htm
> > The correct syntax is:
> > ALTER TABLE foobar add column address varchar(50);
> > ALTER TABLE foobar alter column address set default 'none';
>
> If this:
>
> alter table fooba
On 05 May 2001 12:23:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> Alter table add column ignores default
>
> Long Description
> Alter table add column ignores the
