Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >>>Yes, you posted the functions, but I don't understand how to integrate
> >>>that into dbsize.
> >>
> >>What's the problem? The usage of oids instead of name? The current
> >>dbsize functions are not easy to integrate in queries as executed from
> >>admin tools, as
> >>SE
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
This has been corrected in current CVS.
But it still fails for tables in tablespaces. That's why I posted all
new functions a while ago.
Yes, you posted the functions, but I don't understan
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >
> >>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>>This has been corrected in current CVS.
> >>
> >>But it still fails for tables in tablespaces. That's why I posted all
> >>new functions a while ago.
> >
> >
> > Yes, you posted the func
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
This has been corrected in current CVS.
But it still fails for tables in tablespaces. That's why I posted all
new functions a while ago.
Yes, you posted the functions, but I don't understand how to integrate
that into dbsize.
What's
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This has been corrected in current CVS.
>
> But it still fails for tables in tablespaces. That's why I posted all
> new functions a while ago.
Yes, you posted the functions, but I don't understand how to integrate
that into dbsize.
--
Bruce Mo
Bruce Momjian wrote:
This has been corrected in current CVS.
But it still fails for tables in tablespaces. That's why I posted all
new functions a while ago.
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space
This has been corrected in current CVS.
---
Matthew L Daniel wrote:
> dbsize.c was not updated to use the new tablespace-aware function.
>
> I am not well versed enough with the new function to know if "GLOBAL..."
> was th
